 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
|
|
1
|
NannyMUD / Misc / Re: Multi Chars
|
on: August 24, 2011, 03:45:55 AM
|
|
Very nice discussion.
How do you feel now that not only multi chars is allowed but also playing them at the same time?
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
NannyMUD / Suggestions / Nanny web page
|
on: July 15, 2011, 07:17:47 AM
|
|
Hey!
We should do something about Nanny's web page.
Or if we cannot due to the security policies, how about creating a new un-official webpage that
could attract new players?
Mats, Carrion, others? What do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
NannyMUD / Nostalgia / Re: Who made it, where and why
|
on: July 11, 2011, 06:53:46 AM
|
Sounds a bit like Dz's area, but that was I think 4w n w from green... Pyramid and mummies, anyway  Ramses had his area near Dz's too, I think, can't remember exactly what was there, but pyramids and mummies sound plausible there too I know the area, it was made by Quant's previous wizard. Since he managed to get all his wizards banished, I really don't remember his name, but I remember the area. |
|
|
|
|
8
|
NannyMUD / Daily Rant / Re: Being too clever
|
on: July 11, 2011, 06:50:37 AM
|
Oh fine, The unfortunate who lost a level in the share room was Zyraxes,  Loooool. Why don't I wonder even a bit ?  I would have put my money on it  |
|
|
|
|
11
|
NannyMUD / Misc / Re: Still here?
|
on: July 07, 2011, 06:05:04 AM
|
|
Anyhow, what kept me away (for the periods I was away) was the lack of players.
Nanny became such an addiction to me because of the player interactions.
Less players, less interaction. Ok, right now with multiplaying allowed many things
turned into "playing with oneself", but there are still events where we have to
interact with each other.
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
NannyMUD / Misc / Re: Still here?
|
on: July 07, 2011, 05:40:46 AM
|
I agree we should do something about storage of items. I feel that you should be able to store nearly anything at very low cost. I'll think this through a bit further and discuss it with some other admins.
I even think you should be able to store uniques, and it won't be taken away until another player goes and fetches it from its source. This may take some time to implement because it may need an update to every unique out there, but at least we could put the framework into place.
How does this go so far? |
|
|
|
|
|
Spamfunet Nanny Forum
